<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234564</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. The judgment directed the lower authorities to refund the amounts within sixty days from the receipt of the order. The appellant was not eligible for interest on the refund claims. The decision provided a detailed analysis of the legal issues concerning the refund of cenvat credit for service tax paid on input services used for export services before registration, citing relevant legal precedents to support the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234564</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. The judgment directed the lower authorities to refund the amounts within sixty days from the receipt of the order. The appellant was not eligible for interest on the refund claims. The decision provided a detailed analysis of the legal issues concerning the refund of cenvat credit for service tax paid on input services used for export services before registration, citing relevant legal precedents to support the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>