https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234540 An appeal arising from the same original order cannot be rejected as not maintainable merely because a connected appeal was decided on the same day, especially where that course prejudices the appellants and is inconsistent with natural justice. The appellate rejection was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits. Liberty was also granted to the miscellaneous applicant to place her grievance before the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to consideration of whether a separate appeal had been filed and the factual position on record. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:53:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234540 An appeal arising from the same original order cannot be rejected as not maintainable merely because a connected appeal was decided on the same day, especially where that course prejudices the appellants and is inconsistent with natural justice. The appellate rejection was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits. Liberty was also granted to the miscellaneous applicant to place her grievance before the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to consideration of whether a separate appeal had been filed and the factual position on record. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234540