https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234538 The appeal before CESTAT CHENNAI involved an erroneous refund issue challenged by Revenue. Tribunal found refund within limitation but Revenue appealed to High Court. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside adjudication order, citing premature decision without considering High Court appeal. Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh decision due to pending appeal, allowing the appeal and disposing of the stay application. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234538 The appeal before CESTAT CHENNAI involved an erroneous refund issue challenged by Revenue. Tribunal found refund within limitation but Revenue appealed to High Court. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside adjudication order, citing premature decision without considering High Court appeal. Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh decision due to pending appeal, allowing the appeal and disposing of the stay application. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234538