<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalty under Section 271B for failure to furnish a tax audit report on time. The disallowance of freight expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, but the addition on account of Provident Fund deduction was deleted. The judgments were pronounced on 11.6.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalty under Section 271B for failure to furnish a tax audit report on time. The disallowance of freight expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, but the addition on account of Provident Fund deduction was deleted. The judgments were pronounced on 11.6.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>