<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 335 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234510</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, upholding the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the export of marble blocks for Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Court emphasized that since the facts and legal issues were the same as in a previous case where the deduction was allowed, the present appeal was covered by that decision. The assessee was affirmed to be entitled to the deduction under Section 80HHC, and the stay application was disposed of with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 335 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234510</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, upholding the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the export of marble blocks for Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Court emphasized that since the facts and legal issues were the same as in a previous case where the deduction was allowed, the present appeal was covered by that decision. The assessee was affirmed to be entitled to the deduction under Section 80HHC, and the stay application was disposed of with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>