<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234508</link>
    <description>Where an Indian branch and its German head office followed a genuine fee-splitting arrangement for inspection, survey and certification work, only the profits attributable to the permanent establishment were taxable in India under the India-Germany DTAA; the head office&#039;s retained share was therefore not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands and the related addition was deleted. Amounts remitted towards head office expenses and connected payments, being part of the same treaty-based attribution structure, could not be added under section 40A(2)(b) either; that disallowance was also deleted. The accepted allocation reflected the respective functions of the branch and head office, giving complete relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 333 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234508</link>
      <description>Where an Indian branch and its German head office followed a genuine fee-splitting arrangement for inspection, survey and certification work, only the profits attributable to the permanent establishment were taxable in India under the India-Germany DTAA; the head office&#039;s retained share was therefore not taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands and the related addition was deleted. Amounts remitted towards head office expenses and connected payments, being part of the same treaty-based attribution structure, could not be added under section 40A(2)(b) either; that disallowance was also deleted. The accepted allocation reflected the respective functions of the branch and head office, giving complete relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>