https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234502 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the confiscation and penalty imposed by the respondent for the disputed shelf life of re-exported shrimps. The court highlighted the availability of an alternative remedy through CESTAT, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The court declined to delve into the case's merits, urging the petitioner to pursue legal recourse, as the respondent's order fell within its jurisdiction. The dismissal of the writ petition concluded the legal proceedings, with the court inviting the petitioner to utilize available avenues for appeal. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:52:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234502 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the confiscation and penalty imposed by the respondent for the disputed shelf life of re-exported shrimps. The court highlighted the availability of an alternative remedy through CESTAT, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The court declined to delve into the case's merits, urging the petitioner to pursue legal recourse, as the respondent's order fell within its jurisdiction. The dismissal of the writ petition concluded the legal proceedings, with the court inviting the petitioner to utilize available avenues for appeal. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234502