https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234495 A CESTAT Mumbai order on pre-deposit in a 100% EOU dispute held that there was no prima facie case for full waiver where the third turbo generating set was used to generate electricity sold outside the unit and steam was cleared on payment of duty to another unit. On those admitted facts, the Tribunal found no merit in the contention that steam was non-excisable. Full waiver was declined, but the deposit requirement was confined to the demand relating to steam, and the balance pre-deposit was waived with recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeals. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:51:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234495 A CESTAT Mumbai order on pre-deposit in a 100% EOU dispute held that there was no prima facie case for full waiver where the third turbo generating set was used to generate electricity sold outside the unit and steam was cleared on payment of duty to another unit. On those admitted facts, the Tribunal found no merit in the contention that steam was non-excisable. Full waiver was declined, but the deposit requirement was confined to the demand relating to steam, and the balance pre-deposit was waived with recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234495