<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234482</link>
    <description>The Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within eight weeks. The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:13:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 307 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234482</link>
      <description>The Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within eight weeks. The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>