<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 300 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234475</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully argued against the reliance on a third-party statement by Shri Bhaskar Gupta, not directly connected to the business, in the adjudication process. The lower authorities&#039; failure to establish the third party&#039;s link to the business raised concerns about evidence reliability and fairness. Criticizing the lack of scrutiny on the third party&#039;s connection, the judgment emphasized the appellant&#039;s right to a fair trial. It highlighted the denial of justice due to reliance on questionable evidence and stressed the need for re-examining evidence to provide a fair opportunity for the appellant to defend against allegations effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 300 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234475</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully argued against the reliance on a third-party statement by Shri Bhaskar Gupta, not directly connected to the business, in the adjudication process. The lower authorities&#039; failure to establish the third party&#039;s link to the business raised concerns about evidence reliability and fairness. Criticizing the lack of scrutiny on the third party&#039;s connection, the judgment emphasized the appellant&#039;s right to a fair trial. It highlighted the denial of justice due to reliance on questionable evidence and stressed the need for re-examining evidence to provide a fair opportunity for the appellant to defend against allegations effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>