<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234470</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable when an effective statutory appeal lies against an assessment order, unless the case involves violation of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, ultra vires action, grave jurisdictional error, or miscarriage of justice. The Court found that the assessee had not exhausted the appeal remedy and that the dispute over tax rate and the applicability of the Central Sales Tax Act and Tamil Nadu VAT framework could be examined by the appellate authority. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable at this stage, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234470</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable when an effective statutory appeal lies against an assessment order, unless the case involves violation of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, ultra vires action, grave jurisdictional error, or miscarriage of justice. The Court found that the assessee had not exhausted the appeal remedy and that the dispute over tax rate and the applicability of the Central Sales Tax Act and Tamil Nadu VAT framework could be examined by the appellate authority. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable at this stage, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>