<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 282 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234457</link>
    <description>The appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act was challenged based on the tax effect criteria set by Board Instruction No. 3 of 2011, requiring a minimum tax effect of Rs. 10,00,000 for appeal by the Department. The court dismissed the appeal, citing the actual liability assessed was below the threshold. The conflicting interpretations of different judgments on the applicability of the Board circular to pending cases highlighted the lack of uniformity in legal interpretation. The court dismissed the appeal based on pending cases, reserving liberty for the Revenue to revive the appeal in the future based on relevant outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 282 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234457</link>
      <description>The appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act was challenged based on the tax effect criteria set by Board Instruction No. 3 of 2011, requiring a minimum tax effect of Rs. 10,00,000 for appeal by the Department. The court dismissed the appeal, citing the actual liability assessed was below the threshold. The conflicting interpretations of different judgments on the applicability of the Board circular to pending cases highlighted the lack of uniformity in legal interpretation. The court dismissed the appeal based on pending cases, reserving liberty for the Revenue to revive the appeal in the future based on relevant outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>