https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234412 The Tribunal condoned a 567-day delay in filing the appeal due to a communication gap with the consultant. The stay petition was allowed, leading to a swift resolution of the appeal. The appellant's liability for service tax was upheld, but the matter was remanded for fresh consideration regarding eligibility for small scale service provider benefits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to address this issue, allowing for a comprehensive review. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for a fair decision following principles of natural justice. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:46:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234412 The Tribunal condoned a 567-day delay in filing the appeal due to a communication gap with the consultant. The stay petition was allowed, leading to a swift resolution of the appeal. The appellant's liability for service tax was upheld, but the matter was remanded for fresh consideration regarding eligibility for small scale service provider benefits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to address this issue, allowing for a comprehensive review. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for a fair decision following principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234412