<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 214 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on outward transportation service and manpower supply service. Relying on Circular No. 97/08/2007, the Tribunal held that the appellants met the conditions for credit entitlement, including transportation service up to the port and invoiced bonus and lunch allowances. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were eligible for input service credit on both services, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 214 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on outward transportation service and manpower supply service. Relying on Circular No. 97/08/2007, the Tribunal held that the appellants met the conditions for credit entitlement, including transportation service up to the port and invoiced bonus and lunch allowances. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants were eligible for input service credit on both services, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>