<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234388</link>
    <description>The adjudicating order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a detailed examination of the inputs&#039; composition, year-wise reconciliation, and a thorough analysis to serve the interest of justice. The appellant was granted the opportunity to argue the matter on both factual and legal grounds before the Learned Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234388</link>
      <description>The adjudicating order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a detailed examination of the inputs&#039; composition, year-wise reconciliation, and a thorough analysis to serve the interest of justice. The appellant was granted the opportunity to argue the matter on both factual and legal grounds before the Learned Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>