https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234385 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a show cause notice was premature because the notice only sought objections and supporting documents before any final decision. The settled rule applied was that interference at this stage is ordinarily unavailable unless there is violation of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, or a patent lack of jurisdiction or ultra vires action. As the petitioner still had an opportunity to respond and the authority had yet to decide the matter on merits, judicial intervention was declined and the respondent was allowed to proceed in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234385 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a show cause notice was premature because the notice only sought objections and supporting documents before any final decision. The settled rule applied was that interference at this stage is ordinarily unavailable unless there is violation of fundamental rights, breach of natural justice, or a patent lack of jurisdiction or ultra vires action. As the petitioner still had an opportunity to respond and the authority had yet to decide the matter on merits, judicial intervention was declined and the respondent was allowed to proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234385