<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of non-Basmati Rice valued at approximately Rs. 1.59 crores, declared as Basmati for export, but reduced the redemption fine and penalties to 10% of the Rice&#039;s value. The penalties imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) and its Director were overturned due to insufficient evidence of their active involvement in the export of non-Basmati Rice, granting them consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of non-Basmati Rice valued at approximately Rs. 1.59 crores, declared as Basmati for export, but reduced the redemption fine and penalties to 10% of the Rice&#039;s value. The penalties imposed on the Customs House Agent (CHA) and its Director were overturned due to insufficient evidence of their active involvement in the export of non-Basmati Rice, granting them consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>