<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 198 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234373</link>
    <description>Where books of account were not maintained and only loose papers emerged in survey, estimation of turnover and consequent tax liability was treated as a factual exercise. The Tribunal, as final fact-finding authority, reappreciated the material and enhanced turnover on fresh estimation. As no legal infirmity in that factual determination was shown, no question of law arose for revision and interference was not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 198 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234373</link>
      <description>Where books of account were not maintained and only loose papers emerged in survey, estimation of turnover and consequent tax liability was treated as a factual exercise. The Tribunal, as final fact-finding authority, reappreciated the material and enhanced turnover on fresh estimation. As no legal infirmity in that factual determination was shown, no question of law arose for revision and interference was not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>