<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 194 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234369</link>
    <description>The court held that adjusting a refund towards a demand without prior intimation is illegal and set aside the communication, directing compliance with proper procedures. The rejection of the stay application for the assessment year was upheld, with the court directing timely disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 194 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234369</link>
      <description>The court held that adjusting a refund towards a demand without prior intimation is illegal and set aside the communication, directing compliance with proper procedures. The rejection of the stay application for the assessment year was upheld, with the court directing timely disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>