<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234358</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the customs appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to justify the delay in filing the appeal beyond the statutory time limit. The court rejected the delay condonation application, citing contradictions and negligence on the part of the appellant in handling legal proceedings. Additionally, the confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties under the Customs Act were upheld, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance and discrepancies in justifications. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with deposit requirements and subsequent delays in filing appeals further contributed to the dismissal of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 183 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234358</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the customs appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to justify the delay in filing the appeal beyond the statutory time limit. The court rejected the delay condonation application, citing contradictions and negligence on the part of the appellant in handling legal proceedings. Additionally, the confiscation of goods and imposition of fines and penalties under the Customs Act were upheld, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s non-compliance and discrepancies in justifications. The appellant&#039;s failure to comply with deposit requirements and subsequent delays in filing appeals further contributed to the dismissal of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>