<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 171 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234346</link>
    <description>Penalty for a minor transit excess was held unjustified where the assessee was a substantial dealer and the discrepancy involved only a small quantity with negligible tax incidence, from which no intention to evade tax could be inferred. The court further held that, if any penalty were leviable, it had to be confined to the value of the excess and unaccounted bags actually found in transit, not the value of the entire consignment, because the remaining goods were neither found defective nor unaccounted. The penalty orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:30:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 171 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234346</link>
      <description>Penalty for a minor transit excess was held unjustified where the assessee was a substantial dealer and the discrepancy involved only a small quantity with negligible tax incidence, from which no intention to evade tax could be inferred. The court further held that, if any penalty were leviable, it had to be confined to the value of the excess and unaccounted bags actually found in transit, not the value of the entire consignment, because the remaining goods were neither found defective nor unaccounted. The penalty orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>