<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 168 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and remanded the case for consideration on merits. It found the original pre-deposit amount unreasonable and directed a reduced pre-deposit to enable a fair review of the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of balancing financial obligations with the right to appeal on merits, ensuring justice for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 168 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and remanded the case for consideration on merits. It found the original pre-deposit amount unreasonable and directed a reduced pre-deposit to enable a fair review of the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of balancing financial obligations with the right to appeal on merits, ensuring justice for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>