<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 167 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the liability to pay service tax on maintenance of software and services related to ATMs. It held that software maintenance should not be subjected to service tax before 1.5.2006, citing relevant judicial decisions and explanations in taxation statutes. The Tribunal also upheld a penalty under section 77 but set aside the penalty under section 76, offering the appellants the option to pay the tax, interest, and a reduced penalty amount within thirty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 167 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the liability to pay service tax on maintenance of software and services related to ATMs. It held that software maintenance should not be subjected to service tax before 1.5.2006, citing relevant judicial decisions and explanations in taxation statutes. The Tribunal also upheld a penalty under section 77 but set aside the penalty under section 76, offering the appellants the option to pay the tax, interest, and a reduced penalty amount within thirty days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>