<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the issuance of the show cause notice, meeting the conditions of Section 73(3) and exempting them from penalties. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and discouraged unnecessary harassment of taxpayers who promptly fulfill their obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the issuance of the show cause notice, meeting the conditions of Section 73(3) and exempting them from penalties. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and discouraged unnecessary harassment of taxpayers who promptly fulfill their obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>