<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234286</link>
    <description>Gross negligence in the exercise of quasi-judicial powers can amount to misconduct and justify departmental action even without an express allegation of oblique motive. Where a sales tax officer released impounded goods without verifying end-use proof and levied tax and penalty far below the required figure, the conduct was treated as a serious failure in decision-making rather than a mere debatable error on merits. Judicial review in such matters is confined to the decision-making process, not the merits of the assessment order. On that basis, the disciplinary penalty was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234286</link>
      <description>Gross negligence in the exercise of quasi-judicial powers can amount to misconduct and justify departmental action even without an express allegation of oblique motive. Where a sales tax officer released impounded goods without verifying end-use proof and levied tax and penalty far below the required figure, the conduct was treated as a serious failure in decision-making rather than a mere debatable error on merits. Judicial review in such matters is confined to the decision-making process, not the merits of the assessment order. On that basis, the disciplinary penalty was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>