<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 101 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234276</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and CIT (Appeals) in a case involving the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that making a wrong claim regarding the treatment of gains from stock options did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealing income, as advised by tax professionals. The court emphasized that a wrong claim alone does not warrant a penalty under the Act, citing a Supreme Court ruling and a similar case. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 101 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234276</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and CIT (Appeals) in a case involving the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that making a wrong claim regarding the treatment of gains from stock options did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealing income, as advised by tax professionals. The court emphasized that a wrong claim alone does not warrant a penalty under the Act, citing a Supreme Court ruling and a similar case. The appeal was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>