<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 93 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234268</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment holding the appellant liable for demurrage charges. The court directed the recovery of demurrage charges from the respondents and awarded costs to the appellant. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents, emphasizing the non-liability of the appellant for demurrage charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 93 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234268</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgment holding the appellant liable for demurrage charges. The court directed the recovery of demurrage charges from the respondents and awarded costs to the appellant. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents, emphasizing the non-liability of the appellant for demurrage charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>