https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234267 The Court dismissed the writ petitions as premature, ruling that the Disclosure Statement issued by the Designated Authority lacked binding effect and could not be challenged at that stage. While the Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petitions, it found no sufficient cause for interference. The petitioners were directed to challenge any final notification by the Central Government before the appropriate appellate tribunal. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 11:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234267 The Court dismissed the writ petitions as premature, ruling that the Disclosure Statement issued by the Designated Authority lacked binding effect and could not be challenged at that stage. While the Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petitions, it found no sufficient cause for interference. The petitioners were directed to challenge any final notification by the Central Government before the appropriate appellate tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234267