<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234255</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant for failing to discharge service tax liability within the prescribed time period. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 73(3) regarding payment before the show cause notice issuance was rejected. The tribunal found that the appellant paid the tax liability and interest only after the notice was issued, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234255</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant for failing to discharge service tax liability within the prescribed time period. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 73(3) regarding payment before the show cause notice issuance was rejected. The tribunal found that the appellant paid the tax liability and interest only after the notice was issued, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>