<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 68 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234243</link>
    <description>The court set aside the penalty orders imposed on the assessee under sections 275 and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, thus canceling the penalty levy. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 68 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234243</link>
      <description>The court set aside the penalty orders imposed on the assessee under sections 275 and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, thus canceling the penalty levy. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>