<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234240</link>
    <description>The court rejected the application for condonation of delay, concluding that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The delay in filing the appeal was not sufficiently explained, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234240</link>
      <description>The court rejected the application for condonation of delay, concluding that the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The delay in filing the appeal was not sufficiently explained, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>