<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234239</link>
    <description>Restriction of polished marble slab imports from Sri Lanka to the Port of Calcutta alone was found invalid because it lacked a sufficient nexus with the stated treaty-related objectives. The Delhi High Court noted that concerns about misuse of Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement benefits or non-Sri Lankan-origin goods could be addressed at any port, and that confining imports to one port would neutralise the duty concession rather than regulate it. The condition in Schedule-1, Section XIII of the Import Policy ITC (HS) 2012 was quashed, the port restriction was set aside, and duty collected on imports through other ports was directed to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234239</link>
      <description>Restriction of polished marble slab imports from Sri Lanka to the Port of Calcutta alone was found invalid because it lacked a sufficient nexus with the stated treaty-related objectives. The Delhi High Court noted that concerns about misuse of Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement benefits or non-Sri Lankan-origin goods could be addressed at any port, and that confining imports to one port would neutralise the duty concession rather than regulate it. The condition in Schedule-1, Section XIII of the Import Policy ITC (HS) 2012 was quashed, the port restriction was set aside, and duty collected on imports through other ports was directed to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>