<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 61 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234236</link>
    <description>Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 imposed a mandatory penalty once the prescribed conditions for delayed payment of compounded duty were satisfied. Because the duty was admittedly not deposited within the time required by Rule 96ZQ(3), the consequences under Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) followed automatically. The High Court applied its earlier binding view that, where the rule fixes the penalty at the amount of the outstanding duty, neither the adjudicating authority nor the Tribunal can reduce or waive it on equitable grounds. The Tribunal therefore had no discretion to set aside or diminish the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 61 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234236</link>
      <description>Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 imposed a mandatory penalty once the prescribed conditions for delayed payment of compounded duty were satisfied. Because the duty was admittedly not deposited within the time required by Rule 96ZQ(3), the consequences under Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) followed automatically. The High Court applied its earlier binding view that, where the rule fixes the penalty at the amount of the outstanding duty, neither the adjudicating authority nor the Tribunal can reduce or waive it on equitable grounds. The Tribunal therefore had no discretion to set aside or diminish the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>