<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 38 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234213</link>
    <description>Where the substantive customs duty dispute had already been held to lie outside the High Court&#039;s maintainability and within the Supreme Court&#039;s forum, a consequential penalty order arising from the same matter was likewise not entertainable before the High Court. The Revenue was therefore left to pursue any further challenge before the Supreme Court, and the appeal on the penalty issue was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 38 - KARNATAKA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234213</link>
      <description>Where the substantive customs duty dispute had already been held to lie outside the High Court&#039;s maintainability and within the Supreme Court&#039;s forum, a consequential penalty order arising from the same matter was likewise not entertainable before the High Court. The Revenue was therefore left to pursue any further challenge before the Supreme Court, and the appeal on the penalty issue was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>