<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234209</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, seeking review of an order passed in Central Excise Appeal No.22/2011. The court found no apparent error on the face of the record to warrant review and emphasized compliance with Tribunal observations. It deemed the review petition unnecessary and an abuse of legal process, imposing a cost of Rs.20,000 on the petitioner. The judgment highlights adherence to due process and the limited scope of review jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234209</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, seeking review of an order passed in Central Excise Appeal No.22/2011. The court found no apparent error on the face of the record to warrant review and emphasized compliance with Tribunal observations. It deemed the review petition unnecessary and an abuse of legal process, imposing a cost of Rs.20,000 on the petitioner. The judgment highlights adherence to due process and the limited scope of review jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>