<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234205</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the delay application order passed by the CESTAT and directing the CESTAT to proceed with the appeal filed by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of considering genuine reasons for delay and avoiding unnecessary litigation, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234205</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the delay application order passed by the CESTAT and directing the CESTAT to proceed with the appeal filed by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of considering genuine reasons for delay and avoiding unnecessary litigation, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>