<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234182</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed duty demands and penalties for various issues such as clandestine removal, non-recording of clearance, and overlapping duty demands. However, it allowed the appeal in part, modifying duty demands and penalties. The tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to re-compute and re-adjudicate specific issues based on their directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234182</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed duty demands and penalties for various issues such as clandestine removal, non-recording of clearance, and overlapping duty demands. However, it allowed the appeal in part, modifying duty demands and penalties. The tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to re-compute and re-adjudicate specific issues based on their directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>