https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234179 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, determining that the valuation of goods should be under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than Rule 10A of the Valuation Rules, 2000. It held that M/s. Abhishri was not a job worker and invalidated the penalties imposed on M/s. Symphony and its employees under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2015 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234179 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, determining that the valuation of goods should be under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, rather than Rule 10A of the Valuation Rules, 2000. It held that M/s. Abhishri was not a job worker and invalidated the penalties imposed on M/s. Symphony and its employees under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234179