<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234177</link>
    <description>Coal India Limited&#039;s decision to move from exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E. to payment of central excise duty at 5% plus cess in order to avail CENVAT credit was treated as a permissible tax choice intended to avoid cascading duty and benefit end consumers. The court accepted that only a small portion of coal was sold to traders and that the larger volume reached end users, so the public-interest objection raised by traders had no merit. The challenge to that duty structure and credit position was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234177</link>
      <description>Coal India Limited&#039;s decision to move from exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-C.E. to payment of central excise duty at 5% plus cess in order to avail CENVAT credit was treated as a permissible tax choice intended to avoid cascading duty and benefit end consumers. The court accepted that only a small portion of coal was sold to traders and that the larger volume reached end users, so the public-interest objection raised by traders had no merit. The challenge to that duty structure and credit position was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>