<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 1 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234176</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s order denying waiver of pre-deposit without a hearing was illegal and contrary to law. Citing the importance of natural justice principles and previous court decisions, the Court emphasized the duty of authorities to act fairly and follow established legal principles. The judgment set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, directing a fresh decision within three months with a stay on the pre-deposit requirement. The Court also directed the Commissioner to expedite the appeal process within three months and provide a copy of the order promptly, criticizing the negative attitude towards litigants and potential revenue loss due to hasty decisions without proper hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 1 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234176</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Commissioner&#039;s order denying waiver of pre-deposit without a hearing was illegal and contrary to law. Citing the importance of natural justice principles and previous court decisions, the Court emphasized the duty of authorities to act fairly and follow established legal principles. The judgment set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, directing a fresh decision within three months with a stay on the pre-deposit requirement. The Court also directed the Commissioner to expedite the appeal process within three months and provide a copy of the order promptly, criticizing the negative attitude towards litigants and potential revenue loss due to hasty decisions without proper hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>