https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234167 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant for the refund of Service Tax paid for services categorized as "Mandap Keeper." The Tribunal determined that the appellant had not passed the tax burden to its members, as the club and its members were considered a single entity. Therefore, the Service Tax liability was incorrectly imposed, and the refund was granted without applying the principle of unjust enrichment. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234167 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellant for the refund of Service Tax paid for services categorized as "Mandap Keeper." The Tribunal determined that the appellant had not passed the tax burden to its members, as the club and its members were considered a single entity. Therefore, the Service Tax liability was incorrectly imposed, and the refund was granted without applying the principle of unjust enrichment. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234167