https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234139 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dealt with appeals from both the revenue and the assessee arising from the same impugned order. The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand against the assessee for suppressing the value of service tax and non-deposit of collected tax. The penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dropped. The revenue's appeal was partially allowed due to a change in law regarding assessable value, while the appellant's appeal was rejected for depositing tax at a reduced value. Both appeals were disposed of on 14.03.2013. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2013 05:36:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234139 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dealt with appeals from both the revenue and the assessee arising from the same impugned order. The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand against the assessee for suppressing the value of service tax and non-deposit of collected tax. The penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dropped. The revenue's appeal was partially allowed due to a change in law regarding assessable value, while the appellant's appeal was rejected for depositing tax at a reduced value. Both appeals were disposed of on 14.03.2013. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234139