<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, ruling that the inclusion of SIM card costs in service value raised a bonafide doubt, barring the demand beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bonafide interpretation and lack of malafide intent in tax disputes, setting aside the impugned order on the point of limitation. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that the show cause notice raised beyond the limitation period was time-barred, directing re-quantification within the limitation period and disallowing any penalty on the appellant based on legal precedents and the Kerala High Court decision in the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 05:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, ruling that the inclusion of SIM card costs in service value raised a bonafide doubt, barring the demand beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bonafide interpretation and lack of malafide intent in tax disputes, setting aside the impugned order on the point of limitation. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that the show cause notice raised beyond the limitation period was time-barred, directing re-quantification within the limitation period and disallowing any penalty on the appellant based on legal precedents and the Kerala High Court decision in the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>