<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 722 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234137</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment affirmed the validity of the HUF status claimed by the assessee, the treatment of capital assets, and the gifts received. The decision highlighted the legal and procedural aspects governing the taxation of HUFs and capital transactions, emphasizing the evidence presented by the appellant in support of the creation of the HUF and the gifts received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 05:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 722 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234137</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment affirmed the validity of the HUF status claimed by the assessee, the treatment of capital assets, and the gifts received. The decision highlighted the legal and procedural aspects governing the taxation of HUFs and capital transactions, emphasizing the evidence presented by the appellant in support of the creation of the HUF and the gifts received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>