https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234133 The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of CIT (A)-14, Mumbai for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The delay in filing one of the appeals was condoned, but ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for failure to deduct tax at source under section 194J on payments made to hospitals. The Tribunal relied on the interpretation of the law and a precedent set by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, resulting in the dismissal of all three appeals. en-us Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2013 06:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234133 The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of CIT (A)-14, Mumbai for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The delay in filing one of the appeals was condoned, but ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for failure to deduct tax at source under section 194J on payments made to hospitals. The Tribunal relied on the interpretation of the law and a precedent set by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, resulting in the dismissal of all three appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234133