<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 711 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a customs duty case involving misdeclaration of imported goods as &quot;Semi-Refined Paraffin Wax.&quot; The dispute arose when testing revealed the goods were actually &quot;refined paraffin wax,&quot; leading to a differential duty and penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on oil content, the Tribunal found inconclusive evidence to support misdeclaration, emphasizing the lack of crucial evidence for valuation comparison. The judgment highlights the importance of accurate valuation and the necessity of substantial proof to establish misdeclaration, ultimately ruling in favor of the importer due to insufficient evidence supporting the misdeclaration allegation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 05:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 711 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a customs duty case involving misdeclaration of imported goods as &quot;Semi-Refined Paraffin Wax.&quot; The dispute arose when testing revealed the goods were actually &quot;refined paraffin wax,&quot; leading to a differential duty and penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on oil content, the Tribunal found inconclusive evidence to support misdeclaration, emphasizing the lack of crucial evidence for valuation comparison. The judgment highlights the importance of accurate valuation and the necessity of substantial proof to establish misdeclaration, ultimately ruling in favor of the importer due to insufficient evidence supporting the misdeclaration allegation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>