<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 685 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234100</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order due to non-compliance with Section 245 of the Income Tax Act. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for compliance with the statutory provisions, allowing the respondent to adjust the refund amount after giving proper intimation to the petitioner. The court directed the respondent to complete this exercise within four weeks from the receipt of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 685 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234100</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order due to non-compliance with Section 245 of the Income Tax Act. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for compliance with the statutory provisions, allowing the respondent to adjust the refund amount after giving proper intimation to the petitioner. The court directed the respondent to complete this exercise within four weeks from the receipt of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>