https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234096 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) concluded that there was no violation of Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act by the involved parties. The investigation determined that Apple did not enter into exclusive agreements with Airtel and Vodafone for iPhone sales in India, and the tie-in arrangements did not adversely affect competition in the GSM cellular service market. Furthermore, Apple, Airtel, and Vodafone were not found to hold dominant positions in their respective markets. Consequently, the case was closed, and the Secretary was instructed to communicate the Order to the relevant parties. en-us Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2013 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234096 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) concluded that there was no violation of Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act by the involved parties. The investigation determined that Apple did not enter into exclusive agreements with Airtel and Vodafone for iPhone sales in India, and the tie-in arrangements did not adversely affect competition in the GSM cellular service market. Furthermore, Apple, Airtel, and Vodafone were not found to hold dominant positions in their respective markets. Consequently, the case was closed, and the Secretary was instructed to communicate the Order to the relevant parties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234096