<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 678 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals against orders-in-appeal dated 07.08.2012 due to non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s request to modify the pre-deposit condition imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected, leading to the dismissal of appeals for failing to deposit the required amount. The Tribunal deemed the rejection of the modification request valid, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory provisions. The decision was made without costs, highlighting the significance of compliance with pre-deposit requirements in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 678 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals against orders-in-appeal dated 07.08.2012 due to non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions and Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant&#039;s request to modify the pre-deposit condition imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected, leading to the dismissal of appeals for failing to deposit the required amount. The Tribunal deemed the rejection of the modification request valid, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory provisions. The decision was made without costs, highlighting the significance of compliance with pre-deposit requirements in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>