<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234089</link>
    <description>The Court permitted the petitioner to file objections to the detention notice and the consequential demand notice, and directed the authority to consider those objections on merits. It required the respondent to give an opportunity of hearing and pass a reasoned order within the time fixed by the Court. The writ petition was not finally decided on the legality of the detention or levy; instead, the operative relief was limited to securing consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 11:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234089</link>
      <description>The Court permitted the petitioner to file objections to the detention notice and the consequential demand notice, and directed the authority to consider those objections on merits. It required the respondent to give an opportunity of hearing and pass a reasoned order within the time fixed by the Court. The writ petition was not finally decided on the legality of the detention or levy; instead, the operative relief was limited to securing consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>